PREHISTORIC DACIA

PART 6    Ch.XXXVII (I – IV)

The Great Pelasgian empire

The reign of Typhon (Seth, Set Nehes, Negru Set)

 

PART 6

PREVIOUS

 

XXXVII. The war of Osyris with Typhon (I – II). 

   The war of Jove with Typhon (III – IV).

 

I.

 

After the dethronement of Saturn, the internal peace of the great Pelasgian empire was again shattered, and a new war, much more violent and widespread broke out between the sons of Saturn, for the rule of the ancient world.

Saturn had, according to ancient traditions, three sons (Homer, Iliad, XV. v. 187), who bear though in ancient theogonies different names. The first one is called Typhon by the Greek authors (Philo, H. Ph. Fr. 2. 21; Plutarc, De Is.; Diodorus, I. I. 13. 21), Set by the Egyptians (Plutarc, De Is. c. 41), and Ahriman in the religious traditions of Persia and Bactria.

The second son was Osyris, also called Dionysos by the Greeks, an African of obscure origin, but adopted by Saturn with rights of inheritance of the empire. Finally, the third son was Jove, who had been also reared in southern lands.

The war waged by the Osyris and Jove against Typhon for the mastery of the ancient world bear in ancient Greek literature the name Gigantomachia, or the fight against the superb and ferocious tribes of the Guganii from the Mountains, agria phyla Giganton (Homer, Odyss. VII. 59-60), fight which took place near Oceanos potamos.

 

We have two traditions about these remote events, which appear to have been the beginning of a new phase in the history of human civilization: an Egyptian one, which presents Osyris as the victor and the destroyer of the Gigantes (Giants), and a Greek one, in which all the victories and honors are attributed to Jove, not to Osyris. Each of these two versions presents important data, geographical and historical, which complement each other in many respects.

 

We shall present first the Egyptian version of the war of Osyris against Typhon, called Set in Egyptian papyri and inscriptions.

After the dethronement of Saturn, the northern parts of the Pelasgian empire had in fact remained under the rule of Typhon, whose residence was in the country of the Arimii (Homer, Iliad, II. 783), north of Oceanos potamos (Istru), from where also derives his name Ahriman (Dupuis, Orig. d. tous les cultes, Iv. 410) given him by the populations of Persia and Bactria.

In Egypt though, an African adventurer called Osyris had usurped the reign.

In the beginning, he had asserted that he was a natural son of Ammon / Uranos (Pierret, Le Pantheon Egypt. p. 23, 107), but later that he was the eldest son of Saturn, who had transmitted to him the entire inheritance of the empire (Pierret, Le livre d. morts, p. 213, 83, 395, 488).

We find with Diodorus Siculus the following data, collected from the Egyptian priests, about the expedition of Osyris in Asia and Europe, for the conquest of the ancient world:

 

Osyris, wishing to earn an everlasting glory for his good deeds, gathered a large army with the intention to travel through the entire inhabited world, and to teach the humans everywhere how to plant the grape vine and how to cultivate the wheat and the barley, the use of which he said had been discovered by himself and his wife Isis. After he prepared all that was necessary for his expedition, Osyris entrusted the administration of the kingdom to his wife Isis, to whom he gave Hermes as counselor, and Hercules as military commander. Then, departing with his troupes, he passed from Egypt to Ethiopia, from there to Arabia, and advanced to the ends of the inhabited lands of India. From India he turned to the other peoples of Asia, crossed over the Hellespont to Europe, subjected Thrace and Macedonia, and finally returned to Egypt, bringing with him the most beautiful gifts, received from the subjugated peoples. In memory of this expedition, some said, a column was erected at Nysa in Arabia, with the following inscription: “My father was Saturn, the youngest of all the gods, and I am Osyris, that king who led his armies to all the lands right to the uninhabited lands of the Indians, and from there towards the parts of Ursa, to the sources of the river Istru, and from there even further, to the other parts of the earth, as far as the Ocean. I am by my age, the eldest son of Saturn….There is no place in the world which I had not reached, and I shared with everybody the good things which I myself have discovered (I. I. c. 17, 27).

 

Osyris had conquered therefore, according to ancient traditions, not only Thrace and Macedonia, but also the central regions of Europe, as far as the Western Ocean.

He is often called in religious texts: “Lord of the regions of the south and of the north”. He has two residences, one “in the southern country”, the other “in the northern country” (Pierret, Le livre d. morts, p. 444). But under this latter name the Egyptian papyri did not understand the lower Egypt, but the northern parts of the Pelasgian empire (Grebaut, Hymne a Ammon-Ra, p. 7).

The expedition of Osyris in Europe had the character of a formidable invasion of African and Asiatic hordes. With these semi-wild elements Osyris had formed numerous colonies in the countries which he had conquered, true permanent garrisons, destined to inspire terror and submission in the conquered peoples. Apollonius Rhodius (IV. v. 272 seqq) writes in this regard that someone (Osyris), departing from Egypt, had wandered across the whole of Europe and Asia, and, basing himself on the strength and number of his soldiers, had colonized a big number of cities, some of which are inhabited even today, while others are not, because a long series of centuries have passed since those times”.

 

In Europe though, the expedition of Osyris was met with a much stronger and resolute resistance, than in the vast provinces of Asia. Here the Arimic tribes from the lower Danube rose against Osyris, whom they did not acknowledge, either as son of Saturn, or as legitimate king over the Pelasgian empire.

“The Egyptians”, writes Diodorus Siculus, “tell that in the time of queen Isis had lived those whom the Greeks call Gigantes, and that they are represented in Egyptian temples as being beaten by Osyris” (I. 26). This arrogant triumph of Osyris refers in any case only to the first successes of his expedition in Europe.

The historical traditions of the Germans, extracted from ancient Greek sources, also mention Osyris under the name Oserich (Grimm, Die d. Heldensage, gottingen. 1829, p. 139, 180), about whom they say that he had inherited the rule over the entire north from his father Hertnit (Terra editus?), that he had undertaken an expedition against the country of the Giants (Getae), at the time when those were ruled by Melias (Greek melas, ep. meilas, black), meaning Nehes Set, Negru Set (TN – black Set), the name given to  Set by the Egyptians.

We find finally a historical note with Tacitus, saying that a part of the German tribes of the Svevs sacrificed to the Isis divinity. The origin of this Egyptian cult in the German countries is reduced without doubt to the times of Osyris (Germ. c. 9).

But Typhon, reared in ancient Arimic traditions, a superb character, brave, martial and passionate, considered himself as the only legitimate heir of Saturn, and could not accept that a bastard, as he called Osyris, should reign over the empire of his father (Plutarc, De Is. c. 19. 54; Lepsius, Uber d. ersten agypt. Gotterkreis, p. 53).

In that time, the most excellent force of the Pelasgian empire, the ancient noble class of the Titans, had been extinguished. Some had died in the many expeditions and wars of Saturn, and others had scattered through various countries, so that now the only war power of the Pelasgian empire was formed by the generation of the Gigantes, the ferocious tribes from Oceanos potamos, people from the mountains who, with their tall stature and their strength, surpassed by far the middle and pygmeic statures of the African indigenes.

Against this southern invasion Typhon rose with the tribes of the Giants.

Osyris was defeated and forced to withdraw beyond the Istru, and Typhon chased him with his mounted troupes of the Giants as far as Egypt.

The religious Egyptian texts tell us that Osyris and his other allies had changed into animals, as soon as they saw that Typhon had reached Egypt with his armies (Pierret, Le livre d. morts, p. 78), but this is a simple allusion to the animal figures under which the Osyric divinities were depicted. Finally, Typhon caught Osyris and cut him to pieces (Diodorus, 1. I. 21; III. 62, 6; Macrobius, Somn. Scip. I. 12), which, as Suidas tells us (see ‘Osiris), had caused great sorrow for the Egyptians, who later celebrated for ever the memory of this deed.

According to Egyptian traditions, Osyris was killed by Typhon in Egypt.

According to Romanian traditions though, about which we shall speak later, the cutting of Osyris had taken place on the territory at north of the lower Istru [1].

 

[1. Some of the Egyptian priests attributed this expedition to Sesostris or Sostris, a king whose personality and chronology could not be fixed to this day.

According to Malala (I. II), Sesostris lived in the times of Hermes. He was therefore contemporary with Saturn and Typhon, so identical, from the chronological point of view, with Osyris.

 

According to Herodotus (II. 103), Justinus (II. 3), and Strabo (XV. 1. 6), Sesostris was the first Egyptian king who subjugated all the peoples of Asia, passed from Asia over the Hellespont to Europe, and subjected the Thracians and the Scythians. But, according to religious Egyptian texts, the first expedition to Asia and Europe was attributed to Osyris, and on this glory of his was founded the whole system of Osyric religion, and the national pride of the Egyptian pharaohs.

 

We also note here that according to Val. Flaccus (Argon. V. 418), Sesostris had been the first to come with war against the Getae, but frightened by the defeat of his armies, he had quickly returned to Theba on the banks of the Nile, accompanied by only a small number of his men].

 

Typhon reestablished the authority of the Pelasgian empire in North Africa, and reigned over Egypt as a legitimate king of the divine dynasty for 29 years. During this time he built near the Nile delta, towards Arabia, one of the vastest fortifications of Egypt, called in Egyptian theology Abaris and the Citadel of Typhon, with a periphery of 10,000 jugers (1000? = 46km), according to Manetho (Josephus, c. Apion. I. 26). This fortification, of such a gigantic size, was destined for the withdrawal of the army and of the Pelasgian population in case of a new war with the African indigenes [2].

 

[2. The name of this citadel is not Egyptian. One Abaris, Hyperborean by nationality, is known as a famous prophet of Apollo. Virgil (Aen. Ix. 344) also mentions one Abaris, a soldier in the army of Turnus].

 

Typhon, with the troupes of the Giants, crossed afterwards from Egypt into Asia, to punish there the clients of Osyris, and the turbulent elements who had allied themselves with the African mob against the Pelasgian rule. He conquered Palestine, founded the kingdom of Judeea and the capital called Jerusalem (this is how we explain the tradition transmitted by Plutarc – c. 31 – that Typhon’s sons were Hierosolymos and Judaios).

 

The holy books of the Hebrews also mention the expedition of the Giants to Palestine.

The prophets Jeremiah (c. 4, 6) and Ezekiel (c. 38, 39) threaten the Hebrews with the terrible invasion of a people coming from the depth of the north, called “the spoiler of the tribes” and “the lords of the earth”. Their king, Gog from the country Magog, will fall on the Hebrews with his fine army of riders, armed with bows, swords, helmets and shields. They will take with them as allies the peoples of Libya and Ethiopia; the inhabitants of the cities and citadels will run from the clamor made by the riders and the archers, who afterwards will go in triumph all over the earth and will take the Hebrews in captivity.

 

The poet Manilius mentions the war of Typhon on the territory of Babylonia (Astron. IV. 580; Ovid, Fast. II. v. 462). From Babylonia Typhon advanced victorious over Persia, then crossed into Bactria, and became all powerful over the whole of Asia. The new kings bowed at his feet. Typhon reached now with one hand to the east and with the other to the west, as Apollodorus writes. He had conquered again the entire ancient world.

The terror spread by Typhon and his Giants among the peoples, which had accepted the illegitimate rule of Osyris, had remained legendary with the Egyptians and the Hebrews, the Persians and the Greeks. He is the most terrifying enemy of the southern peoples not of Pelasgian race, a severe avenger of his father and of the ancient nobility, the Titans [3].

 

[3. In the national religion of Persia and Bactria, founded by Zoroastrus, Typhon, under the name Ahriman, is presented as the principle of evil and darkness, which is in perpetual battle with Oromazes, the god of good and light. He is represented under the form of a dragon, who had tried to measure himself with the sky].

 

After the killing of Osyris a new coalition of the southern peoples was formed against Typhon. Isis, the sister and wife of Osyris, helped by his son Horus, and by the southern nations inimical to the Pelasgian race, rose to avenge the death of Osyris and to reclaim the rule of the empire (Diodorus, I. I. 21). In this war Horus was wounded by Typhon on one eye (Plutarc, De Is. c. 55; Pierret, Livre d. morts, p. 252, 281, 299, 338, 345), and according to other traditions, he was killed by the Titans (Gigantes) (Diodorus, I. I. 25. 6).

It is said about Typhon that he was defeated, caught and tied up, but that Isis had freed him (Lepsius, Uber d. e. agypt. Gotterkreis, p. 55). A new war then started, in which Typhon was defeated, chased away, or killed (Diodorus, I. I. 21, 3; 88, 4).

According to the ancient Egyptian monuments though, the facts appear in a completely different light: Horus could not dethrone Typhon, and after many and prolonged battles, a brotherly affection was born between them, so that they divided the empire of the ancient world in two halves, Set or Typhon ruling over the northern regions, and Horus over the southern (Maspero, Etudes, II. 329; Lepsius, p. 51; Pierret, Le Pantheon Egypt. 49).

 

II.

 

With the advent of the wars of Osyris and Horus against Typhon, a general revolution against the ancient Pelasgian domination and civilization began in the southern countries.

In those times Egypt, Phoenicia, Palestine, Chaldea, Assyria and Media contained an immense servile population, formed of subjugated races, and of elements of obscure origin, gathered from the sands of the deserts and from various wild lands.

These colonies of slaves, private and public, were regularly used for the reclamation works of lakes and swamps, for regularizing the course of rivers, opening of roads, fortification of cities, building of palaces, temples, towers, pyramids, transportation of the war machines, and finally, for pastoral and agricultural works.

The ancient Arimic monarchy, exactly like the ancient Pelasgoan family, was composed only by masters and slaves.

In the Egyptian religious texts, Osyris and Horus appear only as representatives of the subjugated races of Egypt, Libya, Ethiopia and Arabia. They wanted to free the indigenous populations from the oppression of the Pelasgian pastoral aristocracy. But on another hand, Osyris and Horus wanted to snatch from the hands of Typhon the scepter of the divine dynasty, and to bring the southern elements to supremacy, to overthrow the superb, despotic, luxury loving race from the northern parts.

 

This is why Osyris went from Egypt to Ethiopia, and from there to Arabia, and all the other southern provinces of Asia: to firstly incite to revolt the lands from further away from the center of the empire. He then turned towards Europe, followed by a great multitude of foreign elements, in order to occupy the ancient and glorious reigning seat of the divine dynasty (Pierret, LIvre d. morts, p. 136).

 

With the rule of Osyris over Egypt started the persecution of the divinities, the customs, and the Pelasgian dominant class. Osyris proclaimed himself in Egypt as sovereign of all the gods, replacing Uranos (Montu) and Saturn (Seb). The ancient Pelasgian religion was replaced by the priests of Osyris with the primitive religion of the indigenous African peoples, a stupid superstition, which venerated their divinities under animal forms (Gibbon, Hist. d. decad. d. I. l’empire rom, ed. 1835, I. 19; Dion, I. 40. 53; Val. Maxim. I. 3); which proclaimed as a principle that after the death of the human body, the soul entered in other animals which were born at that moment; and that only after the soul passed through all the terrestrial, marine and flying animals, for a long 3,000 years period, it returned into the body of another man (Herodotus, lib. II. 123).

 

King Amenophis, one of the most ancient pharaohs of Egypt, ordered that all the images of the kings of the divine dynasty be destroyed, and their names be erased from all the public monuments (Lepsius, p. 40-43).

This persecution was especially directed against the name and images of Ammon (Uranos, Tum).

At Theba, writes Plutarc, a column existed, on which were written curses against king Minis (Saturn), he who had first prompted the Egyptians to lead a simple and sober life (De Iside, c. 8), while in ancient Pelasgian traditions, Saturn was celebrated as the author of a better way of life, “vitae melioris auctor”.

 

But the name and figure of Set or Typhon especially, had been erased from all public monuments (Lepsius, p. 52). The images of Osyris and Horus had been painted in the tombs of the Egyptian kings instead and over the figure of Set, and this persecution of the memory of Set had continued until the times of the 21st dynasty.

In Osyric theology, Typhon is presented as a destroyer, all powerful and undefeatable (Lepsius, p. 53); he shakes everything from its foundation, and ruins everything; he destroys all the sacred teachings of Osyris; he is the sun or the draught which dries and burns; he is the evil spirit, which has filled the earth and the sea with misery; he is the darkness and the lie, the calumniator, who has accused Osyris to have been born of an illegitimate marriage; finally, he is the great serpent which dwells in the primordial water Nun (Oceanos, Istru) and is compared with Python (Pierret, Panth. Egypt. p. 57, 98; Le livre d. morts, p. 23, 46, 135-137), the dragon born of Gaea or Terra, the enemy of the gods, killed by Apollo.

 

The Phoenicians and the Egyptians also called Typhon Smy, Smu (Plutarc, De Isid. c. 62), a name which cannot be explained in the southern languages, but which corresponds to the Romanian form “smeu”, huge demon which breaths fire, dragon, Lat. draco. (In songs of old, Romanian heroes are also often called “smei” – Alecsandri, Poesii pop. p. 153, 196).

 

The Egyptian priests had also attributed to Typhon the constellation of the north, or Ursa major (Plutarc, De Is. c. 21, ed. Parthey, p. 36); Dupuis, II. 357; Maspero, Etudes, II. p. 49).According to the geographical ideas of antiquity, the two “Ursae” were the particular constellations of Dacia, called Ursa Getica, Geticum plaustrum, Geticus polus. This region was therefore indicated in the geography of the Egyptian priests as the country of Typhon.

Finally, the Egyptian priests had also consecrated to Typhon one of the most destructive comets. There is, writes Pliny, a comet, fatal for the peoples of Ethiopia and Egypt, known under the name Typhon, a king from the ancient times. This comet has an appearance of fire, a shape twisted in spirals and a fearful aspect, so that it can be considered more as a knot of fire, than as a real star (Pliny, I. II. 23. 2; Maneto, fragm 84).

 

Typhon was also called by the Egyptians Set nehes, meaning Set the Black (TN – Negru).

Under this name he was represented in Egyptian hieroglyphs by a raven with its ears raised up, and with blunt tips. The raven of Set was often used as the first graphic sign indicating the “Blacks” and the “country of the Blacks” (Lepsius, p. 51).

The raven, as we know, had been a religious symbol of the Hyperboreans from the Carpathians; it was the companion of Apollo the Hyperborean as god of light (Eratosthenes, Cataster. 41; Herodotus, I. IV. 15. 2).

As a principal religious symbol the raven is also figured on the Hyperborean treasure from Petrosa, conserved today in the National Museum of Bucharest (see Odobesco, Le tresor de Petrossa, II. 33).

Finally, the raven was also consecrated in antiquity to Saturn and to Mithras. The epithet nehes, “negru” (TN – black), used by the Egyptians to characterize Typhon, was in fact only an ancient ethnographic attribute of the Arimic peoples from the lower Danube. Typhon, according to the poet Quintus, was from Gaia melaina, Terra nigra (Posthom. V. 485). The raven, the sacred symbol of Apollo the Hyperborean, represents an emblematic connection with the “black country”, or the “country of the Blacks” from the lower Danube.

 

Finally, to Typhon was also consecrated the ass, the characteristic animal of the Hyperborean shepherds from the Carpathians [4].

 

[4. See Northcote et Brownlow, Rome souterraine, p. 334 for the crucifix with an ass head, of the Christians; Tertullianus, Apol. c. 16. The head of the ass was in antiquity one of the symbols of intelligence. The ass was also consecrated to Saturn (Dupuis, VII. 214).

The sect of the Gnostics showed Sabaot (Sabazius) with an ass head (Dupuis, III. 531). The Egyptians understood under the symbolic figure of the ass, especially their enemies from the northern regions (Lepsius, p. 54)].

 

Pindar mentions in one of his odes, the famous feasts of the Hyperboreans, who sacrificed to Apollo hecatombs of asses, chleitas onon echatombas (Pyth. X. v. 33).

On a Gnostic Papyrus from Leiden, Set is shown with the head of an ass, holding in each hand a spear, the national weapon of the Giants. On his chest is written CH(TH), and underneath OEPBHT and BOLXOCH(TH) (Lepsius, p. 55). The last words are composite: OEP - BHT and BOLXO - CH(TH).

Oier in Romanian language means “owner of flocks” and “shepherd of sheep” (pastor). We know in fact from the history of Manetho that the Egyptians called the ancient Pelasgian kings “shepherd kings”.

In regard to the second part of this word BHT, its explanation is more difficult, but BOLXO - CH(TH) is without doubt Seth the Volch or the Valach.

The figure of the ass head was also used in antiquity as an emblem of Dacia.

On some coins from the time of the emperor Trajan Decius (249ad), Dacia, personified as divinity, is shown holding in her right hand a lance or a spear, on the tip of which is seen thrust an ass head (Mitth. d. k. k. Central-Commission z. Erforsch. d. Baudenkmale, VII. 225).

 

A particular veneration though was shown to Set in the times of the 19th dynasty.

Several kings of this dynasty had received the name Set. Set was often honored also with the name Sutech (Lepsius, p. 49; Pierret, Le livre d. morts, p. 173).

One of the ancient Titans was called Sudych (var. Sudech) by the Phoenicians, a word which, as the historian Philo tells us (H. Phoen. Fr. 2), meant dichaios, that is “justus”, but more correctly judex, Romanian “jude, judec” (TN – judge) and “judet” (TN – district).

Finally, we also have an inscription from the times of Ramses II, in which are mentioned the representatives, called Sutech, of several cities (Lepsius, p. 50).

The term Sutech designated therefore in the times of Typhon a superior administrative and judiciary high office, exactly as in the first times of the Roman republic the consuls were also called judices (Livy, Hist. rom. I. III. 55)[5].

 

[5. And because we treat in this chapter the term Sutech, Sudec (Romanian judec) as with the Egyptians and the Phoenicians, we must note here the following: the word Judea, as results from the above historical data, is not Hebraic, but it seems to have been a name given to a province governed at the time of the Pelasgian domination by a superior Judex or “Jude”. This is also confirmed by the geographical genealogy of Typhon, as being the father of Judaios and Hierosolymos].

 

III.

 

We arrive now at the Greek version about the battles with the Giants, events which the peoples, once subjected to the Pelasgians, had celebrated during the course of a long series of centuries, as a divine revenge on those conquerors and despots of the ancient world.

According to Greek authors, the great war with the Giants had been waged by Jove, not Osyris. Jove was the victor, and Osyris, called Dionysos by the Greeks, had only fought under Jove’s command (Apollodorus, Bibl. I. 6; Diodorus Siculus. IV. 5).

“The Greeks”, writes Philo of Byblus (2nd century), “had attributed to themselves several historical events of that epoch, and because their authors wanted to please the ears and hearts of the people, with the sweetness of their fables, they had over-exaggerated those things, using a lot of fiction and embellishments. Hesiodus and the cyclical poets especially, had invented from their own fantasy various deeds and battles of the Giants and the Titans, and in this way they had darkened the truth” (H. Ph. Fr. 2; Diodor. I. 23. 8).

 

The Giants were, according to Hesiodus, a people of divine origin, born of the blood (people) of Uranos and of Gaea or Terra. By their country or mother they were called gegeneis Gigantes (Homer, Batr. V. 7; Diodorus, I. I. 21), Terrae filii, filii Terras, Terrigenae (Naevius, De Bell. Pun.; Val. Flaccus, Argon. II. 18).

The Giants were of a huge stature, much taller than normal. They wore long tresses and beards, and they used in battle shining weapons and long spears (Diodorus, IV. 21. 7; Hesiodus, Theog. v. 185 seqq; Apollodorus, Bibl. I. 6; Apollon. Rh. III. 499).

The Giants, the Greek authors also tell us, were a superb and wild people from the mountains, who hated men of foreign nationalities (Homer, Odyss. VII. 22. 206; Batrach. v. 285; Macrobius, Sat. I. 20; Eustathius, Comment. ad Dionys. v. 327). Their dwellings were in the northern parts of the river Oceanos potamos (Istru), near the country of the Arimii, close to the place where the Titans had been defeated, near Tartaros, today Tatul and Tatar, at the western border of the Romanian Country (Hyginus, Fab. Principium). They are the so-called Gugani, who stand out even today, among the other inhabitants of the Carpathians, with their tall and robust stature).

Hesiodus speaks about the battles of the Giants only in the war of Typhon with Jove.

Typhon himself is presented as the most terrifying among the Giants (Theog. v. 820; Claudianus, Gigant. v. 32; Hyginus, Fab. Principium). The residence of Typhon was in the country of the Arimii, ein ‘Arimois (Homer, Iliad, II. 783), or according to Quintus, in the “Black country”, Gaia melaina (Posthom. V. 416).

Typhon had a monstrous figure with the Greek authors. He had a mixed nature of beast and human.

By the size of his body and by his strength, he surpassed everybody born by the earth until then. With one hand he reached the west, with the other the east. His tresses and beard waved in the air, and fire burnt in his eyes (Apollodorus, Bibl. I. 6. 3).

 

In the first battles with Jove, the Giants were the victors. Jove, seeing that he couldn’t resist the violent assault of Typhon, ran to Egypt, together with his allies, where they all changed into various animal forms, so that Typhon, who was chasing them, could not recognize them. Another battle followed at Casius mountain, in which Jove was wounded and defeated. Typhon caught Jove there, lifted him on his shoulders, crossed the water with him, and shut him in the Coryciu cave in Cilicia. Jove escaped from this prison though, with the help of a woman who was guarding him. Following this defeat, and seeing that he could not beat the Giants, he asked Hercules for help (Apollodorus, Bibl. I. 6. 1. 6).

From then on the war was led by Hercules, not by Jove. As the Greek authors tell us, the final battles with the Giants took place in a meadow at Phlegra, or near the hill, mountain, and village Phlegra, pedion Phlegras (Pindar, Nem. I. 67; Diodorus, I. IV. 21. 5), pedion Phlegraion apo toy lophou (Timaeus, fr. 10, in Fragm. Hist. gr. I. p. 195), Phlegraia plaxi (Eschyl, Eum. v. 295), Phlegra topos chai chome (Schol. of Pindar in Boeckhius II. 434), Phlegraea juga (Propertius, Eleg. III. 9. 48).

 

The Giants, writes Timeus, hearing about the coming of Hercules, gathered all their forces, arranged themselves in battle order and came up against him. A fierce battle ensued (fragm. 10 in Fragm. Hist. gr. I. 195). In the end, the Giants withdrew to a well fortified place, to the rock and the cave called Aornos and Avernis by the Greek authors, Avernus by the Roman poets. Hercules attacked three times the Giants, but without success, and he finally withdrew because of some great earthquakes and other prodigious phenomena (Arrianus, Indica, c. 5; Strabo, I. XV. 1. 8; Diodorus, I. XVII. 85. 2).

According to other traditions though, Hercules totally defeated and destroyed the Giants at Phlegra (Eustathius, Cpomm. Ad Dionys. v. 327; Ephorus, fragm. 70).

 

The Giants fought against Jove and his allies with pieces of lighted wood, with giant rocks, with spears, swords and copper maces; Jove used against them the thunderbolts, and Vulcan hit them with hot chunks of metal (Apollodorus, Bibl. I. 6). The plains and woods where this battle took place took fire and burnt, because of which this mountain was called Phlegra, meaning the “Burnt” (TN – Arsul), from phlegein, to burn (Diodor. V. 71. 4; Strabo, XIII. 4. 11; Hesiodus, Theog. v. 859). The Giants, the legends tell us, also threw against their adversaries a dreadful dragon, whose memory was later immortalized in the constellation called the “Dragon” (TN – Balaurul), near the northern pole (Dupuis, Origine de tous les cultes, II. 199). It is without doubt meant by this the war standards of the Giants, in the shape of dragons, also used by the Dacians in their battles with the Romans.

 

We return now to the geographical situation of the Phlegra mountain in particular.

The Greek and Roman authors from later times of antiquity have tried to move the theater of the battles with the Giants to the regions near the Mediterranean Sea, some to Syria, Asia Minor, Thrace, Thessaly, Epirus and in the Greek islands, while others to the Italic Campagna.

 

But, according to the most ancient historical sources, these events had taken place on the territory of ancient Dacia.

The famous mountain Phlegra, which had terrified Jove and his allies, was situated in the northern parts of the Istru, in the regions inhabited by the Getae. The poet Statius calls this locality Getica Phlegra (Theb. III. 595). According to Orpheus (Argon. 1125) this place was also near the straits of the Riphei mountains.

Especially the Roman poets though had considered their wars with the Dacians as a historical continuation of the battles with the Giants. So, the poet Horatio (Od. III. 4) celebrates the emperor Augustus, who had waged a war with the Dacians, as a victor over the Titans and the Giants. The emperor Domitianus also had decided to conquer Dacia. But his expedition had ended with the withdrawal of the Roman legions from the territories occupied by the Dacians. Nevertheless, the friends of Domitianus celebrated his supposed victories as a triumph over the Giants (Martial, Epigr. VIII. 50, 78).

 

The name and historical significance of Phlegra mountain, where the last battles with the Giants had taken place, have been preserved to this day in the toponimy and historical reminiscences from the lower Danube.

Phlegra of the legends of the Giants is the mountain or hill called today Pregleda and Pregreda, situated near the commune Isvernea in the Mehedinti district. In this mountain is also the famous cave of antiquity, called by the Greek authors Aornos and Avernis, and by the Romans Avernus. Its name is still preserved by the village Isvernea, inhabited by Romanian free peasants, situated on the foothills of Pregleda mountain [6].

 

[6. Although in Latin language the nominative was Avernus, the Roman poets also used the neuter plural Averna (Virgil, Aen. III. 442), certainly basing themselves on an ancient geographical source.

In Homeric antiquity, the place and woods around the cave Avernus, were consecrated to Persephone (Proserpina), the queen of the lower world (Homer, Odyss. X. 499; Diod. IV. 22). This name is still preserved by the village Presna, near Isvernea, where the feast day of the local church is even today that of “The entombment of the Mother of God”.

 

Not only Pregleda, but almost all the heights and ridges of the upper reaches of Cerna present even today the aspect of a vast complex of mountains, which had once been burnt by an extraordinary fire. The Egyptian priests, writes Plato (ed. Didot, II. 200), said the following to Solon: that which is told by your people, that at the time of Phaeton all that was on the surface of the earth took fire and burnt, is true, although it seems a fable.

At the time of the giants”, a folk tradition from Vlasca district tells us, “the mountains and the plains burnt for three years, then the giants (jidovii) were drowned by a great rain, which lasted for a long time”].

 

The ancient Greek traditions also told that Jove’s thunderbolts had made the mountains to cave in, and that part of the Giants had been covered at Phlegra with earth, tree trunks and rocks (Lucilius, Aetna, v. 62). According to other traditions though, Hercules had been the one who had buried there the defeated Giants, under huge quantities of earth (Silius Ital. lib. XII. 151; Val. Flaccus, Arg. II. 19; Strabo, Geogr. I. VI. 3. 5).

 

The word Phlegra, from a linguistic point of view, is only a simple Greek form. Even during Greco-Roman antiquity, there also existed for this mountain the name Prochyta (Silius Ital. I. VIII. 542; Statius, Silv. II. 2. 76; Virgil, Aen. IX. 715; Pliny, I. II. 89. 3), a form which is even closer to the actual name “Pregleda” and “Pregreda” [7].

 

[7. Still in these regions there is also the mountain Casios, where Jove was defeated and caught.

But the real name of this mountain was Cos, not Casios.

According to Apollodorus, the battle of Neptune with the Gygant Polybotes had taken place on the island (understand the mountain) Cos. Another tradition tells us that Hercules, after conquering the island (mountain) Cos, went to Phlegra (Apoll. Bibl. I, 6, 2, 4; II. 7, 1-3; Pherecydis fr. 35). It is therefore evident that the mountain Casios, or better said Cos, of the history of the Giants, was in the same orographic region as Phlegra].

 

The legendary cave-in at Phlegra or Prochyta, with which ended the famous battles with the Giants, can still be seen today in the hill or mountain Pregleda, near Isvernea. It is a gigantic and mysterious collapse, which seems to be more the work of the hand of man, than a simple ruin of rocks and earth, produced by earthquakes, or other natural accidents [8].

 

[8. According to a tradition collected by us at Isvernea, the excavation at Pregleda mountain was made by a “novac” (giant), who wanted to move the course of the river Cerna, on the valley of Cosusta.

This is the same tradition which we find with the ancient authors, only somewhat modified, that Hercules had executed some earthworks near Avernus in Campagna of Italy, in order to protect that place from the flooding of the sea (Diod. IV. 22. I; Strabo, V. 4. 6; VI. 3. 5)].

 

One of the huge mounds of earth, produced by this cave-in is today called “Costa Rancii” (TN – the rib of Rancea). We have here a personal name, “Rancea”, or more correctly “Ramcea” (like princeps from primceps = primus capio), identical in any case with “Runcus”, the name of one of the most distinguished of the Giants who had fought at Phlegra.

As for Typhon, the ancient legends contained different versions: that he had been covered by the cave-in of the mountain Procyta (Silius Ital. VIII. 542); that he had been thrown into Tartaros (Hesiodus, Theog. v. 868; Pindar, Pyth. I. 15); that he had run either to Italy (Pherecydis, fr. 14 in Fragm. Hist. gr. I. 72), or to Sicily (Apollod. Bibl. I. 6. 3. 32; Val. Flaccus, Argon. II. 24).

 

In memory of this war, the Greek authors attributed to Jove the epithet gigantoletes, or gigantoletor, killer of the Gygantes (Lucianus, Philopat. 4; Tim. 4).

 

IV.

 

Among the leading Giants who had taken part in this war, the ancient authors mention:

  1. Porphyrion (Apollod. I. 6), Purpureus with Naevius. He seems to be identical though with Typhon, whom Plutarc calls pirros ta chroa, ruddy.
  2. Runcus or Rhuncus (Naevius). The original form was Rumcus though. An ancient family of Isvernea, today extinguished, was called Rancea.
  3. Coemse (Hygin. Fab.). In Romanian onomastics, Comsa is a family name used often.
  4. Alemone (Hygin. Fab.). Alaman is a family name at the Romanian people. Its original form had been Araman.
  5. Phorcus (Hygin. Fab.), a name which corresponds to the rustic form Porcus, like in porphyra = purpura.
  6. Ienios (Hygin. Fab.). In the onomastics of the Romanians from Hateg and the Closani mountains we have Ianes and Ene. According to Tertullianus, Janus was also called Janes.
  7. Enceladus (Hygin. Fab.; Apollod. I. 6), a name composed of Ence and Ladus.
  8. Capeleus (Ersch u. Gruber, Allg. Encycl. d. Wissenschaften. 1 Sekt, 67. Th. p. 169), a Greek form which corresponds to the Latin form Capillatus. Pliny mentions the Ligurii called “Capillati” (III. 7. 1). The lower class of the Getae was also called chomatai and “Capillati”.
  9. Eurymedon, one of the most ancient kings of the Giants, the father of the most beautiful woman, called Periboea (Homer, Odyss. VII. 58). Eurymedon, is composed in its Greek form, of eurys, wide, and medon, lord, king (TN – domn). Giving the names a Greek form had become even in the times of Homer a literary law for the Greek authors. In Romanian form, Eurymedon would mean “Lat”, “Lad Domnul”, or “Latin Domnul”. King Telephus or Latinus, who had ruled over the regions south of the Istru (see Ch. XXXIII.18) was given the epithet eurymedon (late regnans) by Tzetzes (Antehom. 270), epithet formed as we see, from the ethnic name “Latinus”.
  10. Oromedon, (Propert. III. 9. 48), with the meaning “Lord of the mountains”, or “Lord from the mountainous region”. He seems to be a different person than Eurymedon.
  11. Damysus (called Hephaestion by Ptolemy, Ersch ub. Gruber, ibid. p. 169).
  12. Briareus (Homer, Iliad, I. 404), Greek briaros, strong, powerful. In the mountainous parts of Mehedinti district (Ponore commune) exists the family Briana.
  13. Pallas (Hygin. Fab., Claud. Gig.), certainly Ballas in rustic form. With the Romanians, Balea is a quite widespread family name. Several Romanian villages are called “Bala”, “Baleni” and “Balesci”.
  14. Mimas (Homer, Odyss. III. 4; Sil. Ital. XII. 157). He was buried under the ruined mountainside at Prochyta. A family of free peasants of Isvernea is even today called Mimis.
  15. Foetus (Phoitos), on a vase painting (Gerhard, Trinkschalen d. k. Museums z. Berlin; Schol. of Hesiodus in Ersch. u. Gruber, ibid. 169). It seems to correspond to the family name Fatu (Fetu).
  16. Polybotes or Poliboetes (Apollod. I. 6; Hygin. Fab.), meaning “he with many cattle herds”. In Closani, Mehedinti district, Boetiu is a family name.
  17. Otus and Ephialtes s. Ephialta (Homer, Odyss. X. 307; Apollod. Bibl. I. 6; Sidon. Apollin. Carm. II. 25). In the southern parts of the Carpathians Otu had once been a family name, as results from the names of the villages Otesci (Olt and Buzeu districts). The second name, Ephialta, seems to be composed. Alta in Romanian onomastics corresponds to “Aldea”.
  18. Alkyoneus, whom Pindar (Istm. V. 30-31) calls boubotes, the Giant with oxen. A village part of the commune Isvernea is called Canicea.
  19. Antlas Caeneus (Tzetzes, Theog. in Ersch. u. Gruber, ibid. p. 169). He was probably dwelling near Atlas mountain. In the war of the Giants, writes Naevius (De bello Punico), had also taken part magni Atlantes (the tall Olteni).
  20. Musaeus (Diod. V. 1. 3), is one of the Giants from Phlegra, who had deserted his comrades in the middle of the battle and had crossed over to Jove’s side.
  21. Besbicus (Steph. Byz). The original form had been in any case Bebiscus.
  22. Gration (Apollod. I. 6), more correctly Kration (Romanian Craciun?).
  23. Erylus = Erulus (Hygin. Fab.), corresponds to the family name Iaru (art. Iarul), which the Romanian boyars from the country of Fagaras bear even today.

 

NEXT